Available Now!
Available Now!
Click the image to order.
Bookstore
When University Leaders Won't Lead
When University Leaders Won't Lead by Matthew G. Andersson, Posted May 7, 2024 by Mary Grabar (photo: wikimedia commons)
There are a number of college campus protests going on right now, and they will likely continue in some form, for some time. You may be sympathetic, or you may object on a number of very legitimate grounds. But I’d like to raise another aspect of student protesting, in general, as it relates to how the modern university is organized, and how it has responded to campus protests going back decades. The causes are almost always the same: strong objections to war, to civilian casualties, to war profiteering, and to political privilege. Universities are a natural place to protest and visibly object, as they are in the intellectual center of the foreign policy and intelligence establishment, and they are central to federal and commercial research that is also often directly tied to various forms of warfare science. They are also places where vast sums of money are transferred or even disguised as “research” and they operate as effective arms of the federal government, and on behalf of major corporate interests that together create the well-known industrial complex. They are famous for forming funded “centers” that even assert an expertise in global conflict, and as educational “stepping stones” to the State Department.
The Howard Zinn School of History Writing
"The Howard Zinn School of History Writing" at Doc Emet Productions, Posted September 5, 2023, by Mary Grabar
"On a cold January Night in 2019. . . . Read "The Howard Zinn School of History Writing" for the saga of Debunking Howard Zinn and the efforts by the Left to suppress its revelations.
Brutal Minds, review by M.D. Allen
Brutal Minds: The Dark World of Left-Wing Brainwashing in Our Universities, Stanley K. Ridgley, Humanix Books, 2023, xiii + 275 pp., $27.99 hardcover, review by M.D. Allen (posted May 23, 2023 by Mary Grabar, Image used under license from Freestock.com).
Many (most? all?) conservatives will have seen the face of a dinner-party hostess freeze in contempt and anger as an inadvertent utterance suggests the possibility that she has invited into her house someone who does not subscribe to leftist pieties, indeed someone who may well have voted for Trump in 2016 and 2020. Many (see previous parenthesis) conservatives will have realised that a long-standing friend has clicked in the necessary box to avoid seeing their Facebook posts, although at least we have not, in this case, been peremptorily unfriended. And a good number, alas, will have been told by the college-educated offspring they could previously talk to without stress and strain, quite the contrary, and been told, moreover, with precious little humility, that sex is medically assigned at birth and the Navajo (God save the mark!) have “many gender identities.” What is the reason for this contempt and anger? Wherefore the pain, whence the derision?
Stanley K. Ridgley suggests, with vigour, with full and careful documentation, and with a refreshing malicious wit, that we can blame the nature and role of the contemporary university. Nor, incidentally, do our hostess, our friend, or our offspring need to have spent years at Yale or Princeton. Such is the willed and shameless politicisation of higher education, such is its widespread degradation, that a couple of semesters at Dogpatch State U. will do the job just as well.
Brainwashing sessions
Ridgley’s first chapters deal with brainwashing sessions, and after reading them, with their explanation of unfreezing, changing, and refreezing, one does not jib at the phrase. At first the reader may be a little afraid that Brutal Minds is going to be excessively sweeping and theoretical, but any such fear vanishes after the first fifty pages, when a certain Sherry K. Watt makes her perniciously concrete appearance. Also treading the boards are bell hooks, whose dicta one remembers seeing in the signature blocks of the less impressive of one’s colleagues, and Barbara Applebaum and Cheryl E. Matias, neither of whose names one has previously heard.
The Imperialist Strikes Back: In Defense of German Colonialism
The Imperialist Strikes Back! Brandon Smith on Bruce Gilley's Latest Book, posted by Mary Grabar, August 9, 2022
The opportunity to question my anti-colonial bias scarcely presented itself to me while I was a college undergraduate. As a patriotic American who resented the whimsical tyranny which Britain exercised over American colonists prior to their revolution (as described in the Declaration of Independence), I took for granted that the practice and history of colonialism were indefensible. However, my collegiate consideration of the worth of colonialism had been largely limited to a discussion in an immersive second-year Spanish class in which one student argued that colonization of the Americas benefited some indigenous people with formal education that they otherwise would have lacked. After reluctantly conceding such a point, I was interested to hear a more robust debate on the matter. Although I believed academia would be the proper venue to discuss controversial topics, it would not be until after I graduated in 2017 that one of my professors would bravely expand upon the virtues of colonialism to curious minds around the world.
Bruce Gilley, instructor of my Comparative Politics and Conservative Political Thought courses at Portland State University, submitted his article “The Case for Colonialism” for publication in the Third World Quarterly academic journal in April 2017.
Read more: The Imperialist Strikes Back: In Defense of German Colonialism
Covid Vaccine Pushers
Covid Vaccine Pushers on Campus: A Law and Economics Explanation, by Matthew Andersson (posted by Mary Grabar, May 25, 2022):
“There is no power relation without the correlative constitution of a field of knowledge, nor any knowledge that does not presuppose and constitute at the same time power relations. A despot may otherwise constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly by the chain of their own ideas. On the soft fibers of the brain is founded the unshakable base of the soundest of Empires.” Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison
“A criminal conspiracy at common law involves an agreement (or understanding expressed or implied) to commit a crime, or to commit a lawful act in an unlawful manner. It will be enough if the acts contemplated are corrupt, dishonest, fraudulent, or immoral.” Justice Blair Moody, Jr., People v. Carter
In August of 2020 I wrote an article concerning the leading role played by universities in the Covid pandemic program. At that time, higher education’s most observable institutional behavioral change was in its ready, unquestioning acceptance of government and corporate medical concepts, and in their almost immediate auto-coordination as a group, into biosecurity “compounds.” This was especially observable during the first wave of enforced behavioral alteration directed at students, while faculty, along with their union, the AAUP, continue to be eagerly compliant. These initial institutional alterations included startling new uses of social engineering language, including “social distancing,” “sheltering in place,” “isolation,” along with a method of what mathematicians call “ant farming,” which involves the channeling, herding and ultimately the self-directed conformity of group mass behavior, which is observable in insect colonies.
New Human Mass Behavioral Practices
The introduction and dissemination of testing and face masks marked the beginning of a radically new modification of human mass behavioral practices, while strengthening the attendant psychological splitting of cognition and personality, both at an individual and social level. This split borrows from human psychology and its instinct for dualistic, analogue or “black and white” distinctions. Covid created the safe and unsafe; the trusted and untrusted; and member and non-member tribalism. The ritualization of masking also created an ideological branding and signaling function as group social identity and political affiliation even, became symbolized and reinforced by the mask—a kind of postmodern armband of separation and belonging. It was (and is) combined with carefully orchestrated media saturation, “expert” testimony, and media personalities and political figures who reinforced rapid mass compliance (or in many cases, heightened suspicion and caution).
- On Thomas Jefferson's Birthday
- Is the Law Dead?
- Asserting Our American Christian and Classical Heritage
- In Defense of American Democracy
- What Happens When Law Schools Embrace Critical Race Theory?
- Why Are Universities Pushing Covid Vaccination?
- The "Chicago School": What It Really Is and Why It Matters
- Samizdat, Beautiful Italy, January 10, 2021
- A New Direction or the Status Quo for University Leadership: The Case of the University of Chicago
- Speaking in Athens, GA
- Debunking Howard Zinn Portland to Atlanta Speaking Tour
- National Vietnam War Veterans Day 2020
- On Grading Zinn-ers' Papers
- Grievance Studies Exposed at Portland State
- Covid-19 on Campus: Turning the University of Chicago into a Re-Education Camp
- University Greek Life: A "Super-Spreader" of Independence?
- White House Conference on American History
- Save the Children from Howard Zinn, Speaking in Portland
- A College Student's Take on Howard Zinn's America-Is-Evil
- Reparations, a History Lesson
Page 1 of 8
Search
Allies
Donate
Make your tax-deductible contribution to Dissident Prof
Prefer to send a check?
Click Here
